Hi,
I have moved to ConTeXt from Latex many years before.
It is nice and simple.
Since then I used ConTeXt except the case of writing a paper.
One thing I couldn’t satisfy is the math typesetting in ConTeXt. It is not so
bad, but I have to do some extra jobs to make the output of math things look
good.
But math typesetting ability in ConTeXt is upgraded continuously, and now we
can see a nice output in the math manual.
I think that a font, spaces, etc in Math are matter of taste. Of course, it is
my personal thought.
I thank Hraban to write a ConTeXt book which needs a lot of efforts.
And, I’d like to add “Use also \dm{}” in the Mikael’s suggestions.
> I'd like to conclude by saying (as previously mentioned) I don't want to
> step the toes (or be seen as stepping on toes) of people who put in great
> efforts to provide such an excellent tool to the world (for free!) and who
> are always ready to help on this mailing list. I sincerely appreciate
> everyone who makes contributions (large or small) to ConTeXt and the
> ConTeXt community.
I also agree with Jim, and I always mention my appreciation to the experts of
ConTeXt in the acknowledgement in my books.
With best regards,
Dalyoung___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : [email protected] /
https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
