Hi Hans,

Thank you so much for taking the time to look at the project and for your 
valuable suggestions. I truly appreciate feedback from someone with your deep 
expertise.

Your points about \environment and \component are excellent. In fact, my 
initial approach was to use these very commands to structure the project. 
However, during development, I struggled to achieve the straightforward file 
discovery and loading mechanism I had in mind with them. Ultimately, I opted 
for \input as it provided a more direct and transparent way to implement the 
recursive file loading that is central to the kit’s design, especially for 
users who might be less familiar with ConTeXt’s more advanced structural 
commands.

Your feedback has certainly encouraged me to revisit the official documentation 
and the structure of the larger manuals. I believe a deeper look will give me 
more clarity on how to potentially integrate these powerful features in a 
future iteration without compromising the initial goal of simplicity.

Regarding the use of texmf-project and the advice on font caching, those are 
very important considerations. I will definitely look into them and add a note 
to the documentation to make users aware of potential conflicts.

Thanks again for your insightful comments.

Best regards,

Seyal
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : [email protected] / 
https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive  : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki     : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to