On 7/29/2026 1:57 PM, Jean-Pierre Delange via ntg-context wrote:
The Voronoi document also compiled correctly. Its ordinary Voronoi and
Delaunay operations are very fast, generally in the millisecond range.
The more demanding stippling examples took about 0.94 seconds for
triangles and cells, while the CVD examples remained around 0.08 seconds.
the 16 iterations for the context stipple (converging towards more
uniform) does a delaunay and voronoi for every step; interesting is that
the runtime shifts from the former to the later as we iterate (here we
stay in the 0.020 domain); i could squeeze out some from the voronoi so
effectively maybe half the runtime but ... is is worth it ... probably
only Hraban will use that specific one and regular usage often has way
less points
it is all about finding the balance between c-helpers and lua code,
using each for what it's best in
but we'll see what demands come up
thanks for testing this,
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : [email protected] /
https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
