Adam Lindsay wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
what we need is a set of encoding files like
/UniEncoding52 [
....
/uni52DF
/uni52E0
I hate to be negative, but I have doubts about how generic this
approach may be. In some tentative experiments, I discovered that many
(most?) CJK fonts don't use traditional postscript names, but rather
map from unicode to an indexed glyph number.
Fortunately, ttf2tfm's -w [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ notation seems to address this
in most of the old test cases I tried.
afaik pdftex can handle the indexXXXX and unicXXXX entries as
alternatives for glyphnames
Hans
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
