<--- On Mar 21, David Arnold wrote ---> > All, > > Both this: > > %output=pdf > > \starttext > > We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered > pair}. If you think of the positions taken by > \placefigure > [left][fig:ordpair] > {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} > ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane > (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why > order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the same as > the ordered pair $(2,4)$. > > \stoptext > > And this: > > %output=pdf > > \starttext > > We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered > pair}. If you think of the positions taken by > \placefigure > [left][fig:ordpair] > {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} > ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane > (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why > order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the same as > the ordered pair $(2,4)$. > > \stoptext > > Lead to the same attached result. This is not the behavior expected. Any > ideas?
I am not sure on what you want to achieve, but does this look better? \starttext \placefigure [left][fig:ordpair] {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered pair}. If you think of the positions taken by ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the same as the ordered pair $(2,4)$. \stoptext HTH, Aditya -- Aditya Mahajan, EECS Systems, University of Michigan http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~adityam || Ph: 7342624008 _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context