Thank you for your explanations, and yes I probably do need percent
signs if my test case had been more severe. Hans, with characteristic
swiftness, already sent me back a vastly improved version which I will
test as soon as I get a chance.
Johan
2006/6/7, Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I do not have R installed here. but:
>
> Johan Sandblom wrote:
> >
> > % I would like to reduce this two-stage call, but then line-endings
> > disappear
>
> This two-stage approach is required unless each statement in R is
> terminated uniquely, by something like a semicolon because then
> you could redefine the semicolon at the writing stage.
>
> > \def\startR%
> > {\bgroup
> > \obeylines
> > \catcode`\%=\@@letter
> > \catcode`\#=\@@letter
> > \dostartR%
> > }%
>
> Don't you need percent signs at the end of the @@letter lines?
>
> > \stopmode
> > \typeRout%
> > \egroup}%
>
> You can make that
>
> \stopmode
> \egroup
> \typeRout }
>
> because \typefile doesnt need \obeylines
>
> Cheers, Taco
>
--
Johan Sandblom N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh
t +46851776108 17176 Stockholm
m +46735521477 Sweden
"What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the
will to find out, which is the exact opposite"
- Bertrand Russell
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
