> If the batch file is still functionally equivalent, it would > make sense to include it in the distribution. I vaguely recall > that I had removed all of the 'smart' stuff from the batch > file to please command.com, making it much less functional, > but perhaps that is more an indication of how well I know > command.com ;-)
As I remember, most, if not all of the smart stuff mentioned has to do with automatic recognition of the install-directory. All this smartness is nice, if things work. In the other cases smartness is a jungle and it would be easier to check a dumb but simple list of set commands. These batch-files for example are not smart enough to recognize if they are running under the right command- prozessor and a normal windows 98 user might be very helpless what had gone wrong. But the settings in scite had to be altered too. Wolfgang _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
