Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> And for the LIGKERN: yes, I asked about them on the tex-fonts list a
> while ago, and nobody considered them a problem. IMHO, they're
> totally useless or even worse, but I received the same ol' answers:
> can't change that, it's legacy etc. I think Mojca knows something
>
indeed, not even broken things are fixed; i wonner what those ol' users
are doing with their patterns since i expect an update in patterns to
have more consequences than a fix in fonts
> about this as well. So my suggestion would be: make ec a synonym for
> lm-ec in texfont (but then, because of one or to glyphnames, lm-
> ec.enc has to be in the mapfile as well).
>
i see, interesting; before we do that, can you check if we can/need to
do the same with texnansi, qx, etc ?
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
