Dear all! THe packages of ConTeXt I am currently preparing are tested by a user and he send back the following questions/comments. Could you please comment on this.
For the background: I install all the stubs from scripts/context/stubs/unix into /usr/bin, add a texmfstart stub that calls ruby with the right path to texmfstart.rb. ----- Forwarded message from Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- > From: Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: New texexec very confused > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:52:30 -0700 > > The new ruby texexec is very confused. The problem of output > defaulting to pdf instead of dvi has already been noted. Here > are some additional problems: > > Command: texexec --output=dvips foo > Should produce: foo.dvi > Actually produces: foo.pdf > > Command: texexec --dvi foo > Should produce: foo.dvi > Actually produces: foo.dvi AND OVERWRITES foo.ps > > --Mike Bird ----- End forwarded message ----- ----- Forwarded message from Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- > From: Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Is texmfstart secure? > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:08:53 -0700 > > Package: context 2006.08.08-0.4 > > If anyone who knows Ruby has time, can you tell if texmfstart is > secure? I was really surprised to see client-server code. Even > localhost services can lead to privilege escalation if not careful. > For example, /usr/share/texmf/scripts/context/ruby/texmfstart.rb > contains the following. I'm not a Ruby programmer but the comment > leads me to think there is a potential problem here: > > # danger lurking > buffer = ' ' * 260 > length = filemethod.call(filename,buffer,buffer.size) > if length>0 then > return buffer.slice(0..length-1) > > It looks like PRAGMA is trying to reinvent kpsewhich, integrate internet > explorer, launch editors, and do a whole bunch of other stuff I haven't > figured out. texexec should be a simple wrapper around tex or pdftex > but it works via texmfstart.rb which is 2541 lines of Ruby - and that's > a lot of Ruby. It may all be wonderful (I am not a Ruby programmer) but > it makes me nervous. > > Is an older/simpler texexec still available? > > --Mike Bird ----- End forwarded message ----- Best wishes Norbert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Università di Siena Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian TeX Group gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TABLEY SUPERIOR (n.) The look directed at you in a theatre bar in the interval by people who've already got their drinks. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context