Mojca Miklavec wrote: >>>> The best way out would be if I could enable ConTeXt's UTF-8 regime while >>>> running XeTeX in \XeTeXinputencoding=bytes mode, but I haven't gotten >>>> that to work yet. >>>> > > That would mean that you loose the whole range of glyphs & scripts > outside of the scope which ConTeXt supports (you would land almost at > the level of pdfTeX again). For most european users that might still > be something reasonable, but I wouldn't go that way. > > >>> maybe mojca has >>> > > (little correction to what I wrote in my previous mail) > > If you were really looking for that part of code - simply replace > \expandafter \endinput inside XETEX block in regi-utf.tex with > \XeTeXinputencoding=bytes. Then \enableregime[utf-8] will mean that > ConTeXt took control over utf instead of XeTeX. From what I understood > on the wiki, it probably used to be that way at the beginning, but > then Hans changed his mind and decided to ignore \enableregime[utf] > completely when processing with XeTeX. > indeed; when this is uncommented (i.e. traditional utf is used) ... do the patterns still work as expected?
----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context