I would like to ask once more since there was no response on the
prevous post: are there any objections against adding the following
patch to enco-uc.tex?
\definecharacter textasciicircum {\uchar{0}{"5E}}
\definecharacter textgrave {\uchar{0}{"60}}
\definecharacter textdiaeresis {\uchar{0}{"A8}}
\definecharacter textmacron {\uchar{0}{"AF}}
\definecharacter textacute {\uchar{0}{"B4}}
\definecharacter textcedilla {\uchar{0}{"B8}}
\definecharacter textcircumflex {\uchar{2}{"C6}}
\definecharacter textcaron {\uchar{2}{"C7}}
\definecharacter textbreve {\uchar{2}{"D8}}
\definecharacter textdotaccent {\uchar{2}{"D9}}
\definecharacter textring {\uchar{2}{"DA}}
\definecharacter textogonek {\uchar{2}{"DB}}
\definecharacter texttilde {\uchar{2}{"DC}}
\definecharacter texthungarumlaut {\uchar{2}{"DD}}
(second number should be written in decimal, but I don't want to be
responsible for a wrong conversion ;)
Mojca
On 12/12/06, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in enco-uc.tex there are some definitions which use "combining" accents:
>
> \definecharacter textgrave {\uchar3{0}}
> \definecharacter textacute {\uchar3{1}}
> \definecharacter textcircumflex {\uchar3{2}}
> \definecharacter texttilde {\uchar3{3}}
> \definecharacter textmacron {\uchar3{4}}
> \definecharacter textbreve {\uchar3{6}}
> \definecharacter textdotaccent {\uchar3{7}}
> \definecharacter textdiaeresis {\uchar3{8}}
> \definecharacter textring {\uchar3{10}}
> \definecharacter texthungarumlaut {\uchar3{11}}
> \definecharacter textcaron {\uchar3{12}}
> \definecharacter textogonek {\uchar3{40}}
>
> But this is almost useless, since those fonts that have things like
> "ccaron" missing (which are exactly the ones for which such kind of
> definitions might be useful) don't have any glyphs on those slots.
> Appart from that \buildtextaccent is used for "combining", so there
> should be no real need for using "combining accents" at that place.
>
> Here's a copy of relevant lines from contextnames.txt (as a refence to
> which values the values above should be changed if others agree):
>
> 005E;asciicircum;textasciicircum;CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT
> 0060;grave;textgrave;GRAVE ACCENT
> 00A8;dieresis;textdiaeresis;DIAERESIS
> 00AF;macron;textmacron;MACRON
> 00B4;acute;textacute;ACUTE ACCENT
> 00B8;cedilla;textcedilla;CEDILLA
> 02C6;circumflex;textcircumflex;MODIFIER LETTER CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT
> 02C7;caron;textcaron;CARON
> 02D8;breve;textbreve;BREVE
> 02D9;dotaccent;textdotaccent;DOT ABOVE
> 02DA;ring;textring;RING ABOVE
> 02DB;ogonek;textogonek;OGONEK
> 02DC;tilde;texttilde;SMALL TILDE
> 02DD;hungarumlaut;texthungarumlaut;DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT
>
> Would it be possible to fix those lines in enco-uc.tex?
>
> (Writing because I needed to use ccaron in one of the fonts which
> doesn't have that. After redefining textcaron to a proper value it
> worked OK for that specific font.)
>
> Thanks,
> Mojca
>
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
