On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote:

> 
> Hi Aditya,
> 
> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> > 
> > 4. The theorem should have a title. The title should be optional.
> >> Is partially implemented
> 
> I used to work around that by defining a layer on top of the
> enumerations that always define the enumeration's settings
> on the fly. Quite inefficient, but it worked OK. Support in the
> core would be much nicer, though.

I will try to add this to as a patch to enumerations, and see how it 
works.

> > The last things, that is the end of proof marker, is right now not 
> > possible in ConTeXt. There are a lot of things that need to be taken 
> > care of while having a end-of-proof marker: basically, you need to 
> > ensure that there is no page break between the proof and the marker. 
> > Also the marker needs to be moved up or down, depending on how the 
> > proof ends. At the very least, ConTeXt should have something that 
> > ensures that the end of proof marker does not go onto a page of its 
> > own.
> 
> End of proof markers are a pain, and I see no easy solution.

I saw a proof.tex for plain tex, which ensured that the end of the 
line marker stayed on the same page. No support for correct 
spacing for itemize and formula. The ntheorem package does that, but I 
do not fully understand the algorithm, so it may be harder to port. I 
will try a port of proof.tex if I can find it again.

Aditya
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

Reply via email to