> That is the chicken and egg problem I was talking about. > When the publication list sort order is 'by citation order', > and 'only show cited publications' (as per ams), then \cite > looks at the list to find the number, and the list checks > the \cite order for what to include. All is good if the > ref is actually there, but intercepting errors is problematic.
I see ... just curious: do you happen to know how the LaTeX folks handle wrong citation keys? >> Wouldn't it be nice to just replace the "(Xxxx, 0000)" entry by "??" >> to make it consistent with the cross referencing errors? > > I did it this way, because I prefer better-matching page breaks over > visual similarity. At least some of the other \cite options > generate ?? > instead. I'm afraid I don't follow you ... what does it have to do with page breaks? Oliver _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
