Hi Thomas,

On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:

>
> On Jun 11, 2007, at 5:49 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
>> Some of the difficulties that I faced with simple documents was:
>>
>> 1. What is the xml equivalent of ||
>> 2. What is the xml equivalent of ~ (  ??)
>> 3. What is the xml equivalent of
>>
>> \abbreviation {EECS} {Electrical Engineering and Computer Science}
>> and then \EECS\ and \infull{EECS}.
>
> Hi Aditya,
>
> I've just begun experimenting with xlm (because, as Duncan has
> pointed out, I'm sure that every line I write is for eternity...).
> Anyway, what I say here may be totally wrong, but here's how I treat
> this stuff:
>
> 1. For || or |-|, I have defined an entity in my DTD:
>
> <!ENTITY conthyph "-">
>
> In my environment for processing the xml files, I have
>
> \defineXMLentity[conthyph]{|-|}
>
> so I can write context&conthyph;specific and get the output I expect.
>
> 2. Yes, I use &nbsp; with these definitions:
> <!ENTITY nbsp "&#x000A0;">
> \defineXMLentity[nbsp]{~}

Ah. Thanks. This was easy :)

> 3. Abbreviations: does xtag-ent.tex do what you want?
>
> Not sure if this is what you're looking for, but it does appear to
> work for me.

Hmm... somehome I had missed xtag-ent.tex. I was looking at xml 
introductions, and did not look into ConTeXt sources. I will have a 
look and see how it goes.

Thanks,
Aditya
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to