Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini wrote: >>>> well, i still use texfont for type 1 fonts, but for open type i >>>> use luatex anyway which can handle it directly (actually, mkiv also >>>> usese afm files instead of tfm when available, so texfont is not >>>> needed any more) >>> How stable/reliable is LuaTeX for general use? >> Well, "not at all" is the wisest answer I can give. > > Is it possible to run both (mkiv/LuaTeX and mkii/pdfTeX) in parallel?
Certainly. In the past year, I have been happy running all of these at the same time: texexec | texexec --pdftex % engine=pdftex texexec --aleph % engine=aleph texexec --luatex % engine=luatex texexec --xetex % engine=xetex Cheers, Taco ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________