Hans Hagen wrote: > luigi scarso wrote: > >> After some delay, >> http://www.stixfonts.org/ > > i wonder how useful these fonts are ... split over many fonts; pfb in > otf disguise (so we need many commands and families, or we need to make > a virtual font, or ...)
They do seem to have 'math' feature information, but the glyph splits are ridiculous. E.g. the normal weight "Script alphabet" (U+1D49C-U+1D4CF) is in the italic font, and the bold weight is in the bolditalic font, as if it were a normal text font. ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
