Hans (07/11/2007 16:09) said: >> Btw: Is there any reason for not using XeTeX (or LuaTeX in the future) >> for Chinese? (To be honest: I have absolutely no idea whether it works >> and how good it works if at all, but I would expect less problems >> there.) >> > > i bet that duncan uses it in some workflow that has to be stable i.e. no > moving targets like xetex or luatex (yet) > > Hans Exactly right. :-) We have some big plans for LuaTeX across Latin, Arabic and Chinese alphabets, but for now we have to stick to the old tried and tested...
Duncan ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
