On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:43:35AM +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > texmfstart is usually "copy texmfstart.rb to texmfstart in bin and > make it executable". The drawback is that if something changes, it > needs to be updated in the bin folder as well.
Hello Mojca, that's why a stub is useful. > Isn't this a bit dangerous if scripts move around? > script=$(dirname $0)/../../ruby/texmfstart.rb Indeed, it works only, if you don't move it... My idea was ---to simplify my installation script--- only to add execution bits to .../stubs/unix/* and add .../stubs/unix to the PATH. But texmfstart seems to be an exception, I'll just keep my symbolic link. > (In case that you figure out some more details about "context" stub, > please let me know ... I didn't manage to make it work either. It > seemed as if luatex didn't manage to find mtx-context.) It works for me, if I put .../scripts/context/lua/context into my PATH and add the --run option to the mtxrun call. And $@ should be "$@" of course. (This stub is fine, because it means "context file" = the future and "texexec file" = the past.) Cheers, Peter -- http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/ ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
