Santy, Michael wrote:
> Its entirely possible that I'm missing something, but I was merely inquiring
> about running the same timing tests that you did with mplib, but instead
> using the existing MKII and MKIV image inclusion code. How much of a speedup
> over the existing code does the mplib integration buy us for this benchmark?
well, processing 15K mp graphics either runtime or delayed would take
way much time (no fun timing)
it all depends on how you use mp graphics, but for most purposes mp
processing time goes down to nearly zero
btw, mkiv mp inclusion code is faster than mkii code
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
