luigi scarso wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Yue Wang wrote: >>> I think it is better to only return a table while calling the Lua >>> function. The table contains key=value pairs for >>> {sysname=,nodename=,release=, version=,machine=}. For Windows, you >>> just fill these names by hand instead(easy, isn't it?). >> Easy to say, sure. You are not on windows either, I assume? >> >> Anyway, 0.30.0 will have both the old and the new ( os.uname() >> function), and the old variables will not go away until 0.40.0. >> >>> LuaTeX is going public in >>> months, so before that every major API change is OK to the developers. >>> After public, changing APIs will make other developers unhappy. >> I do not know what you are referring to. Nothing in the API is >> fixed until 1.0.0, and that is still a few years off ! > hmm, we must what david says about that, see > http://granthinam.blogspot.com/search/label/Conference report > "Kastrup, one of the developers of LuaTeX,"
funny, the luatex team is 3*h (hoekwater, henkel & hagen) ... small is beautiful (efficient and effective) -) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________