=> Could one comunicate "how to scan them for infomation" or must
that stay a secret?
they are easy to understand.
[I repeat: "easy to understand"!]
I totally agree with you, it's really useless to invite to read the
sources without providing a tutorial on source reading for non expert
TeX users.
Ulrich Dirr, who had posed the question about his kind of footnotes
asked back 21.07.2008 at 09:09:
O.k. I could look in the source too, but where did you read
'location=normal'? Also I don't know what other option are
allowed, e.g., in
\numbercommand or \split. Only the default values are here as I
understand.
I support this question (only that I don't know how to look in the
sorce yet...)
Me too
Best
-a-
--------------------------------------------------
Andrea Valle
--------------------------------------------------
CIRMA - DAMS
Università degli Studi di Torino
--> http://www.cirma.unito.it/andrea/
--> http://www.myspace.com/andreavalle
--> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------
"
Think of it as seasoning
. noise [salt] is boring
. F(blah) [food without salt] can be boring
. F(noise, blah) can be really tasty
"
(Ken Perlin on noise)
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
