Dnia Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:14:10AM +0200, Patrick Gundlach napisał(a):
> As for the logo...
> >
> > Who cares ?
> >
> > Logo's don't enable people to figure out how to use software and be
> > productive with it.
> >
> > The proof is in the pudding, not in the logo.
>
> Right, but presenting ConTeXt in a more professional way could be
> worth an effort. A new logo is one step forward, even it will
> disappear again in some day.
On my personal webpage, I'm using a small wiki engine called oddmuse.
It's maunal says in one place:
"Logos and little icons (usually smilies) are eye candy and therefore of
utmost importance."
As you said: a professional-looking logo is a good thing.
BTW: the current logo looks like this:
O
C N
E
T X
T
I don't like the order; what about
O
C N
T
T X
E
?
This way, we emphasize the TeX logo inside the ConTeXt one.
> Patrick
Greets
--
Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.faculty.fmcs.amu.edu.pl)
- Why did a mathematician call his dog Cauchy?
- Because it left a residue at every pole.
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
