Hi, it's me again...

I managed to finish my first "serious" ConTeXt project (in fact, it was
a two-page math test for my wife, who teaches maths;)).

But I encountered quite a few problems with itemizations.  To sum it up,
I've prepared a minimal sample file illustrating them.  Here it is:

========= cut here =========                                                    
\def\testitemize#1#2#3{{\bf #1}\par
\startitemize #2
\item plplplpl
\item plplplpl
  \startitemize #3
  \item plplplpl
  \item plplplpl
  \item plplplpl
  \item plplplpl
  \item plplplpl
  \stopitemize
\item plplplpl
\stopitemize
{\bf Blah, blah.}
\page}

\starttext

\testitemize{Default values.  Works fine.}
            {}{}

\testitemize{Different numbering.  Results in overfull hboxes---???}
            {}{[a][left=(,right=),stopper=]}

\testitemize{Outer one packed.  Inner one gets also packed---is this
ok???}
            {[packed]}{}

\testitemize{Inner one packed.  Works fine.}
            {}{[packed]}

\testitemize{Both packed.  Works fine.}
            {[packed]}{[packed]}

\testitemize{Inner one joinedup.  Works as packed---???}
            {}{[joinedup]}

\testitemize{Inner one packed and joinedup.  Works as packed---???}
            {}{[packed,joinedup]}

\testitemize{Outer one joinedup.  Does this imply packed?}
            {[joinedup]}{}

\testitemize{Inner one twocolumn.  Why is this packed, too?}
            {}{[columns]}

\testitemize{Inner one 2-col and joinedup.  What about the space
  {\em after} the inner one?}
            {}{[joinedup,columns]}

\testitemize{Outer one twocolumn.  packed implied???}
            {[columns]}{}

\testitemize{Outer one 2-col. and joinedup.  packed implied (?), apart
  from that fine.}
            {[joinedup,columns]}{}

\stoptext
========= cut here =========

Most cases are wrong (or at least strange)---each page with at least one
question mark is something I can't understand.

Which ones are bugs and which ones are features?  What to do to overcome
these problems?

Also, I've noticed that the [intro] option does not _prohibit_ page
break---is that ok?  The manual (or wiki, I can't remember) says it
_discourages_ it---but shouldn't it prohibit it completely?

And one more: what is the difference between \page[yes] and
\page[makeup]?  I didn't notice any.

Hope you don't get fed up with me, folks...  I promise to put some
answers on the wiki soon (during the next few days).  Maybe I'll even
post a complete working file as a sample...  I hope that all my
questions (and your answers;)) will lead to a better typesetting tool...

Greets

-- 
Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.faculty.fmcs.amu.edu.pl)
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to