Hi, Taco,
Thanks for your clear explanation!
as had been pointed out by you,
TeX Gyre project is a font development effort,
not a redistribution.
So why don't we develop our own flavor of Garamond?
Yue Wang
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Taco Hoekwater <t...@elvenkind.com> wrote:
>
>
> Yue Wang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think the two font families are distributed by URW in free licence?
>
>
> The license of URW Garamond prohibits modification so it can not be
> imporved upon bt the TeX Gyre project, and the Symbol font will not
> benefit from Gyre-ification due to its symbolic (non-text) nature.
>
> Bear in mind that the TeX Gyre project is a font development effort,
> not a redistribution.
>
> Best wishes,
> Taco
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
> Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
