Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Corin Royal Drummond wrote:
Many have voiced the same complaint. I understand that Hans and every
one are occupied with building MKIV (aka LuaTeX), and that documentation
is not their highest priority. There's the wiki, the wonderfully active
mailing list, and what used to be decent docs from 2001/2002 timeframe.
But yes, it's a steep hill to climb, made worth it only by the relative
awesomeness of ConTeXt.
You missed the reference manual rewrite effort (which is now in
remission mostly because of an extremely depressing lack of user
feedback).
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Main_Page#Documentation
Hi Taco,
I'm sorry that I haven't given much feedback on the documentation
project. I got through the Typography chapter, but then was so
confounded by the Fonts chapter that I didn't feel able to give
comments. I will make another attempt.
Cheers,
Rory
Best wishes,
Taco
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
