On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > - or setuptex should be rather an executable, that prints out the > > environment to apply, then one would do something like this: > > eval `setuptex` > > (cleaner solution, but some work to do and all minimal-users must change > > their habits...) > > I theory adjusting PATH should do, but it's a nice proposal :)
So TEXMFCACHE and TEXMFOS are not needed? And what about the praxis in contrast do the theory? Here my little test: unset TEXMFOS unset TEXMFCACHE context test -> MTXrun | unknown script 'context.lua' or 'mtx-context.lua' Cheers, Peter -- Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/ ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
