Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 15:23, Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
and has no influence in mkiv. (The
workaround in mkii is to use \theta instead of θ, in mkiv it makes no
difference.)
in mkiv (unicode) we need complete bold fonts .. (or make additional
vectors); bold alphabets are part of math in unicode and should work ok but
symbols is a 'whole font' issue
I agree ... there are lots of other symbols.
I noticed the "tex-bi" in math-vfu (I'm still looking into beta
version). There's no mapping for it, but I guess that it's probably
exactly the same as "math-bi".
Do you plan to misuse "tex-bi" or to to define mathematics.make_font (
"lmroman10-boldmath" ... ) for bold math then?
currently only math tf is defined (fam 0) and we will also have math bf
(fam 1); mostly a matter of definitions but i was not in the mood to
figure out all the bold fonts involved/needed
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
