Jose Augusto wrote:
Hi Hans,
I ran just now ruby 1.8.6 and the force_encoding() patch worked well.
yes, but if we can avoid adapting all those strings ... i'm pretty sure
that if we follow that route we have to patch a lot
also keep in mind that in 1.9 there are several encodings (external and
internal) so setting up a roundtrip using the string properties involves
more patches)
Just now I upgrade "--context=current". The banner in the texexec.rb is
banner = ['TeXExec', 'version 6.2.1', '1997-2009', 'PRAGMA ADE/POD']
and the date of this script (after updating) is 10-04-2009 (its April..)
I'm running mkii. How do I get mkii beta scripts, as texexec.rb you mention?
it depends: if (on linux) "texexec" is a big file then you need to copy
texexec.rb to texexec, else if it's a stub it should just work (in that
case texmfstart will start texexec.rb)
All my rubys are compiled from the box with mingw in windows
(2000 or XP, in 3 different machines). Of course the encoding
thing is different in Linux, Windows (and DOS prompts, for the matter),
so there is probably different behavior in ruby/context/tex interaction with
on windows there should be a stub (something texexec.cmd == "ruby
texmfstart texexec ...")
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
