Am 27.09.2009 um 11:39 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Am 27.09.2009 um 10:14 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
As there was no answer at all on this post:
does it mean that there is no way to solve my problem??
\flushfootnotes should do the trick.
Sure, that's what I assumed, too. But it doesn't ;o(
Please have a look at page 15 in "test_x.pdf" generated from
"text_x.tex" in this folder:
http://werksatz.com/attachments/TEST_X.zip
The \flushfootnotes was written at the end of "einleitung.tex" and
thus should prevent the next chapter from einleitung's footnotes.
What is wrong?
I have no idea. An explicit \page\hbox{}\page 'fixes' this particular
file, but that is not a proper solution. Maybe it is because it is a
split footnote?
Yes maybe...
Right now this is not a usable situation. But it should be at least a
feature request for MkIV:
When setuphead is defined with "page=yes" there shall NO footnote be
written from a chapter/section before!
Never. Not even a split note.
Steffen
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
