On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Aditya Mahajan <adit...@umich.edu> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, luigi scarso wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Aditya Mahajan <adit...@umich.edu> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Am 16.11.2009 um 09:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> The problem is the vertical alignment of the item number, which >>>>>>> should >>>>>>> be at the top of the frame. Is this possible? >>>>>> >>>>>> Add location=top to \setupframed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Aditya >>>>> >>>>> Oh, that's good, thanks Aditya! The baselines still don't quite agree, >>>>> but it's just a minor difference. >>>> >>>> If you hadn't notice the item is wider then the running text, in MkIV >>>> you can say 'width=\dimexpr\textwidth-\itemgrouplistwidth\relax' >>>> (not the best method but \localhsize is not available) >>> >>> Shoudn't width=broad just work? It doesn't, so I consider this a bug. >> >> I don't remember : >> is broad related to \hsize or \textwidth ? > > I always thought that broad should use as much space as possible. So, > anything more or less is a bug :) Yes, but \maxdimen is as much space as possible.... :-) Anyway I will give it a look.
-- luigi ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
