Philipp Gesang <pges...@ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de> writes: > Hello Wolfgang! > > On 2010-02-08 <12:25:58>, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: >> ConTeXt has many features but sometimes there is something missing, >> what feature or package do you miss which is already available in >> another TeX system or unavailable in any TeX system? > Most definately: all the details of Philipp Lehman's BibLaTeX package > which is one of the greatest things LaTeX has to offer: multi-part > bibliographies, lots of different citation rules, manifold idem/ibidem/ > op. cit. &c handling, authoring new styles -- all solved in one single > stroke and neatly documented. > > That'd be "nice to have" …
I second this. Right now, biblatex is the killer feature that I'm at least partially stuck with LaTeX. However, I wonder if it would be hard to do a port of biblatex to context. I've not looked into the code yet, but I doubt that there is much LaTeX specific code... Best regards, olli ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
