On 14-2-2010 14:30, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I know that people would usually use \type{em...@address.com}, but I
must be missing something. Is there really no \textat (under some
other name) defined anywhere in ConTeXt?
well, @ normally works quite ok so i never felt the need for a \textat
(or \texta \textb \textc)
for mkii just adding it to enco-def.mkii is anough as i it sits in the
same spot in all encodings
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
