On 2-4-2010 14:20, John Haltiwanger wrote:
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Hans Hagen<pra...@wxs.nl> wrote:
well, i use mkiv exclusively so that might be a sign that it's not that bad;
the main issue is to keep mkiv and luatex in sync
Good to know :)
I would much prefer mkiv as well, as luatex seems much easier to grok
than TeX. I have the luck to be entering typographical programming at
a new stage. To what degree can luatex be relied on to accomplish all
that TeX macros can? Does certain functionality still require TeX
code?
the same and more, it's still tex but we can now extend using lua so we
can go beyond what normal tex can do
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
