Good evening all,
interaction remains a mystery to me. When tracking things I encountered
the following deviation in footnotes:
---8<--------------------------------------------------------------------------
\startluacode
track = {}
track.preceding = ""
function track.simple(arg)
context("Last one:\\ {\\bf " .. track.preceding .. "}.\\ " ..
"This one:\\ {\\bf " .. arg .. "}")
if arg == track.preceding then
context("\\ -- matching!")
else
context("\\ -- not matching!")
track.preceding = arg
end
end
\stopluacode
\def\track#1{\ctxlua{track.simple("#1")}}
\def\foottrack#1{\footnote{\ctxlua{track.simple("#1")}}}
\starttext
\section{Normal}
\track{one}\par
\track{two}\par
\track{two}\par
\track{one}\par
\track{one}\par
\track{two}\par
\track{one}\par
\section{In Footnotes}
\foottrack{one}
\foottrack{two}
\foottrack{two}
\foottrack{one}
\foottrack{one}
\foottrack{two}
\foottrack{one}
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\section{In Footnotes, interaction enabled}
\footnote{\hrule}
\foottrack{one}
\foottrack{two}
\foottrack{two}
\foottrack{one}
\foottrack{one}
\foottrack{two}
\foottrack{one}
\stoptext
% vim:ft=context
---8<--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd naively expect \track#1 to behave identically regardless of
interaction. How do I make it interaction-proof, and, if possible,
how do I interaction-proof macros in general?
Thanks for your efforts,
Philipp
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
