On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:33:56PM +0200, Otared Kavian wrote: > On 18 juin 2010, at 17:43, Khaled Hosny wrote: > > > Compare the size of the primes with xits, cambria and modern, only the > > later is correct. > > Hi Khaled, Hi Hans, > > Thank you so much to bith of you and all other people involved in the project > for giving us so rapidly the ability to use stix, and xits, fonts. > I tried for a week or so both stix and xits fonts on many of the documents I > have in ConTeXt. I can say that as far as simple text is concerned everything > works like a charm. However, regarding stix and xits there are some issues > with math mode: > > • With stix fonts, the integral sign doesn't scale up correctly, and the > placement and maybe the sizes of the indices and derivative signs are > incorrect.
If they did, then there wouldn't be any reason for xits to exits :) > • With xits fonts, the integral sign is correct but the placement of the > indices and exponents are not always correct (see the example below). Also > for some reasons the greek letters are not anymore italicized. I run your test and the lower case Greek is italic. The *script placement on the text integral is wrong, looks like the italic correction is either ignored or applied incorrectly. > I have also a question regarding the use of calligraphic script style, like > the font rsfs, which are contained in xits and stix: how can one use them? \cal ? -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
