2010/7/10 Michael Talbot-Wilson <m...@view.net.au>:
> Running I think any browser on any Linux system, if I see a PDF file
> on the Web and click on print, and then print to a file, I
> automatically finish up with a .ps file.  Which I can display with gv.
> The PDF format was all the time redundant.

No. Only nobody puts a PDF RIP into consumer printers. The situation
is completely reversed with printing houses: There you will have
problems getting PostScript printed.

> I'm not competent to debate the merits of PDF versus PS but I know
> what I want.

:-)

> I would like the high-level conveniences of ConTeXt, the ones I
> mentioned, but they don't supersede the rest.

The ConTeXt team will not spend much effort (if any) to make MkIV run
with dvi(ps). So stop whining and show us your patches. :-)

> "In  DVI  mode, luaTeX can be used as a complete replacement for the
> TeX engine."

Yes. But MkIV needs much more then DVI and currently aims at PDF.

Best
   Martin
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to