On 18-7-2010 9:02, H. van der Meer wrote:
I have a comment on the name of macro "\xmldoiftext".
The name as is, seems specifically to point to something like:
<node>some_text</node>
Luckily the manual mentions here "when .. node has some content" and
this implies the {yes}-branch will be taken also in case of the presence
of subnodes, even if these lack text content:
<node><subnode/></node>
I am happy to find that this is indeed the behaviour, because it is what
I need.
Thus I am inclined to consider "\xmldoifcontent" as a better descriptive
name instead of "\xmldoiftext". Or is it already too late to change its
name?
yes, as i 've used it a lot already
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
