On Sep 26, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Wolfgang Schuster 
<schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> 
> Am 26.09.2010 um 02:02 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
> 
>> Does it make sense to copy the definition of mult-aux.mkiv to mkii? 
>> Everything other than \definenamespace should work in both mkii and mkiv. 
>> That way, I can use it in modules that target both mkii and mkiv.
> 
> Parameter handling is different in mkii and mkiv and it’s not such a problem 
> to write different code for each of them.

But right now, I use a unified parameter handling for both mkii and mkiv. 

> For fancybreak i used different mechanism for each of them and i think you 
> should do this as well with your filter module.

You are essentially maintaining two modules, one for mkii and one for mkiv. At 
least for the filter module, I would like to maintain only one module. The 
current version has manual parameter handling. Some of which can be automated 
using \installparameterhandler etc. That is why I am asking part of 
mult-aux.mkiv to be copied to mkii. 

Aditya
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to