On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:18:20 +0100
Mojca Miklavec <mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
I should think about it a bit. But just a few
possibilities ... At the
moment I use:
\startpublication
[k=xy,
t=xy]
....
\stoppublication
Options are:
When we think from the bibtex side, it would boil down to
processing the "keyword=" key (which is already there in
the bibtex specification). You could then order your
"publications" with terms such as "keyword=image"
"keyword=article" etc.
1.)
\startpublicationlist[images] or
\startpublications[images] or ...
\startpublication[k=xy,t=xy]
....
\stoppublication
...
\stoppublicationlist
2.)
\startpublication[k=xy,t=xy,list=images]
....
\stoppublication
3.)
\startpublication[images][k=xy,t=xy]
....
\stoppublication
And then
\placepublications[list=images]
Then \cite would work in exactly the same way (one would
not need to
provide any extra key to cite itself).
But one would need to think of a proper model to number
the
references. That is: it would have to be configurable to
be able to
either number images with roman instead of arabic
numerals (or with a,
b, c, ...), or to prepend something, like [img1],
[img2], [img3]
instead of [1], [2], [3]. Or simply let the user do "in
\cite{figure}[xy]", or to number images with numbers
bigger than other
references. For example:
Books:
[1]
[2]
[3]
Articles:
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
Images:
[8]
[9]
or
Books:
[1]
[2]
[3]
Articles:
[a1]
[a2]
[a3]
[a3]
Images:
[i1]
[i2]
or any other user-configurable option for numbering ...
However, having a properly designed model is better than
having some
ad-hoc solution that turns out not flexible enough or
clumsy to use
and buggy later on ...
One syntax would be
\placepublications[filter=image,prefix={img.},option=continue,numberconversion=romannumbers]
And yes, something that would allow splitting references
across
sections could just as well be used for this. It just
needs to be
designed properly ... (But section-based bibliography
could work
without any extra key, right?)
And no, please don't count it as bug report. I just
mentioned it
because Hans wanted to have "a big bunch of everything
at a single
place".
I suggest to reopen the topic and create exact
specification before
the actual implementation.
Yes, we can discuss it (on or off list) when it will be
implemented.
Thomas
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
