Hi,

I uploaded a new beta:

The character definitions have been updated (esp math, thanks to Aditya).

After some testing by Wolfgang the decision was made to permit _ in macronames in modules. So, the following works:

\unprotect
  \def\test_test_test#1#2{#1+#2=whatever}
  \test_test_test{1}{2}
\protect

In principle we can also support ^. The mkiv code base no longer uses _ and ^ in math in modules and those who write modules should avoid them as well. So, when writing macros in unprotected mode, one schould use:

$x\normalsuperscript2\normalsubscript n$

Taco and I think that we can safely switch to \nonknuthmode in mkiv so this might happen soon (which means that _ and ^ become normal characters in text mode). Actually, being permanently in \nonknuthmode would permit _ and ^ in modules again.

We could even make _ and ^ always letters outside math in which case \text_test etc would become possible everywhere but that needs some more consideration. In that case

\def\make_subscript#1#2{\mathematics{#1_{#2}}}

\make_subscript{x}{2}

becomes valid everywhere. We can discuss this in detail at the dev list.

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
    tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to