On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 23:49, Stefan Müller <warrence....@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi!
On 27.02.2011 20:58, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, S Barmeier wrote:
I don't know if anyone feels the same, but I'm not happy with the
spacing of commas in math mode (pictures attached). For instance,
typesetting H^1(X,F), the comma seems to be closer to the F than to the
X. Equal spacing on both sides or setting the comma closer to the X are
I guess a matter of taste (inserting a \neghairspace after the X
achieves the latter). In any case, I would kind of prefer equal spacing.
\setupmathematics[autopunctuation=no]
@Hans: I would suggest that this should be made the default.
IMO this does only partially help, consider the following example:
\starttext
$(B, Y, R, X)$
\setupmathematics[autopunctuation=no]
$(B, Y, R, X)$
\stoptext
In both lines the spacing after "Y" is way to big. I don't know if that's a
bug or just ugly. (version 2011.02.15 16:11)
In text parts this is known as kerning. In OpenType math there are
complex bounding boxes.
I would call it a bug. The spacing is OK with cambria, but not with xits.
Aditya
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
