On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 11:41:58AM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote: > 2011/3/2 Mojca Miklavec <mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com>: > > I really like the particular answer pointing to bugroff licence: > > http://www.reocities.com/SoHo/Cafe/5947/bugroff.html > > It's a nice joke, but for practical purposes a one-clause BSD > license allows the same freedoms, but is legally clear.
I was about to say that, though I'm pro strong copyleft (AKA GPL when fits) myself, though I highly doubt, for practical reasons ;), that any one can take a BSD licensed ConTeXt and make a closed source derivative with any substantial improvement. Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Egyptian Arab ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
