Hi,
For your information, just out of curiosity, I tested Wolfgang's code
\starttext
\count0=0
\loop\ifnum\count0<3986 % try 3987
\advance\count0 by 1
\shipout\vbox{}
\repeat
\end
\stoptext
which works fine with 3986 pages but not with 3987 pages and above.
This is with mkiv, version: 2011.02.25 22:03, and LuaTeX version
beta-0.65.0-2010121316
on Mac OS X 10.6.6.
Best regards: OK
On 15 mars 2011, at 16:35, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> On 03/15/2011 03:44 PM, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
>>
>> Am 15.03.2011 um 11:27 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
>>
>>>
>>> Am 15.03.2011 um 10:07 schrieb Vnpenguin:
>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>>> Taco
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not here:
>>>>>> \starttext
>>>>>> \dorecurse{5000} {\input knuth \page }
>>>>>> \stoptext
>>>>>> pages> flushing realpage 3987, userpage 3987
>>>>>> PANIC: unprotected error in call to Lua API (stack overflow (out of
>>>>>> stack space))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mtx-context | fatal error: return code: 1
>>>>>> with latest minimals.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have exactely same error as you on Linux x86_64 CentOS , luatex
>>>>> beta-0.65.0-2010121316
>>>>>
>>>>> However on my Windows XP (always with Minimals distro) I can compile
>>>>> without error. On Windows I have :
>>>>> E:\User\xxx\tex>luatex --version
>>>>> This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.66.0-2011021923 (Web2C 2010) (rev 4086)
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe luatex of Linux 64bit is out-of-date ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Just update luatex to beta-0.66.0-2011031509 (rev 4090) and now I got
>>>> 5000-pages PDF :)
>>>
>>>
>>> I also updated now [got beta-0.66.0-2011031511 (rev 4090)]
>>> but still my project gives a PANIC!
>>>
>>> I'll try now to boil down a minimal example out of my chapters ...
>>
>>
>> Four hours later:
>> Still I do not have a "minimal" example. But I think I have an idea what
>> might be the problem:
>> The number of footnotes seems to have an impact.
>> I boiled it down to a version of my project where just a little additional
>> note causes PANIC.
>> Adding another page of text or a sectioning heading or anything else is fine.
>>
>> Does this help further finding the bug?
>
> Not really, sorry. Unless the problem gets worse if you add extra footnotes
> earlier?
>
>> Does it make sense to have compare both tuc files (the last working and the
>> first buggy)?
>
> Probably not.
>
> Best wishes,
> Taco
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
> Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Otared Kavian
Département de Mathématiques
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin
Bâtiment Fermat
45 avenue des Etats Unis
78035 Versailles cedex
Téléphone: +33 1 39 25 46 42
Secrétariat: +33 1 39 25 46 44
Secrétariat: +33 1 39 25 46 46
e-mail: otared.kav...@math.uvsq.fr
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
