Hi,
I recently started to dabble in typography. There's a lot to learn
there. The proposed book sure is a good start, but there are also lots
of online resources (e.g. www.typophile.com - their forum is filled with
interesting discussions about your question).
What I've learned in the last months is that there are no hard rules -
only guidelines. When it comes to choosing a font for a book, it depends
(like already mentioned) on the kind of book. A dragon-fantasy book may
take a different font than a childrens book or a futuristic novel.
Compare for example Monotype Centaur to ITC Stone Serif. Then again, the
font should not distract from the contents of the book, but it can help
adding a little "soul" to it.
You also have to consider the features you need. Do you need greek or
russian characters? Do you need small caps? How is the ligature support?
Maybe oldstyle numbers would be nice? Do the italics please you or are
they too fancy and somehow don't fit in? How many cuts (italic,
semibold, bold) do you need?
Another tip would be: go to the library or check the books you own for a
pleasing design and adopt it (I think in this case, copying/ "stealing"
is a good thing ;). Sometimes the typeface used is mentioned on the
publishing information on the first couple of pages. If not, use
www.whatthefont.com and a scan/photo to identify or use
www.identifont.com with the Q&A system.
And theres always the list of more or less safe fonts (no claim to be
complete):
Arnhem
Bembo
Caslon
Dante
Fournier
Garamond
Goudy (Old Style)
Hoefler Text
Janson Text
Minion
Palatino
Sabon
Stone
And finally: Your budget. Are you willing to buy fonts? That would
probably come in at 30-60 bucks (but that's nothing if you are serious
aboutt your book). If not, some of the above can be obtained for free
(still being commercial fonts, e.g. Minion with Adobe Reader, Hoefler
Text is on Mac OSX...) but only a few are really free. Apart from the
TeX-fonts I can thing of Linux Libertine (not resticted to Linux,
despite the name), Vollkorn or some from "The League of moveable type".
As a final inspiration, this beauty:
http://fontsinuse.com/moby-dick-the-arion-press-edition/
Take care,
Christian
Am 20:59, schrieb Curiouslearn:
Cecil, thanks for asking this question. Even though the answers
may/will be subjective, it is quite likely that there are people here
who have given some thought to font choice. I agree with previous
responses that reading a book on typography would certainly be
helpful. Nevertheless, I am interested in hearing what fonts people
like (if they do not mind sharing). I, and perhaps some others, may
learn about a few fonts.
Bharat
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:31 PM, David Rogers
<davidandrewrog...@gmail.com> wrote:
* Cecil Westerhof<cldwester...@gmail.com> [2011-03-14 12:44]:
At the moment I use for my ebook:
\usetypescript[palatino][texnansi]
\setupbodyfont[palatino,rm,12pt]
Does not look to bad, but layout is not my forte. So if people have tips
about the fonts to use, I like to hear them.
Do you use other fonts when using a printed book?
I don't think this question can have one answer. There are many good
answers, depending on the kind of book (or other printed material).
1. I think the layout of the page itself can have a great deal to do
with whether a certain font looks good (e.g. amount of white space,
length of lines, etc). Paying proper attention to the "gross" aspects of
your layout, such as margins and line heights, goes a long way to
improving the appearance of the whole work, and brings out the best in
whichever font you choose.
2. To some extent, different fonts can suit different material (e.g. a
book of poems vs a financial report, or a textbook vs a novel). For
extended reading, the conventional wisdom is to choose a
"normal-looking" font that doesn't call attention to itself too much,
but obviously you also want one that is at least somewhat attractive to
look at.
3. Frankly, giving people what they are already used to is often the
best plan - probably more often than typographers would care to admit.
In my opinion, variation for its own sake is over-rated and over-used.
--
David
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________