Am 28.04.2011 um 22:56 schrieb Marco: >> http://www.elijournals.com/images/articleFigures/0302/msw0321a.gif > > I intentionally didn't suggest a layout like this. 1st it > has a horrible spacing and 2nd it's very hard to read.
+1 >>> This would mark up the text surrounding the pull quote as >>> somehow different than the one preceding and following the >>> pull quote and thus confuse the reader. >> >> I don’t think so because it’s common in magazines but TeX >> isn’t the best tool for this. > > Mostly in magazines the layout comes first and the > readability second, that's why magazines can't be a > measure for a readable layout. Best example is variable > inter-character spacing. > >> • >> http://www.wyssdesign.com/Wyss_Design_Images/Bookprojects/Wyss_Design_Success_Spread1.jpg >> • http://www.twopeaspublishing.com/assets/sample_pullquote.jpg > > These both pull quotes are not centred. No but the look better and disturb you (or at least me) while reading. >> • http://homeforprofits.com/wp-content/uploads/wikipedia-pullquote.png >> • >> http://forums.adobe.com/servlet/JiveServlet/showImage/2-2897250-31035/Picture+32.png > > This looks fine, it's common this way. But it only works > in a two-column layout. I assumed we're talking about one > column layouts. Yes, for more columns use always the full width, even spanned columns are possible but i won’t use shaped text. Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
