On Tue 24 May 2011, Stefan Müller wrote:
> is the bibliograph style as mentioned in "If your document design
> specification requires a different style of capitalisation, you should
> acquire a bibliography style that doesn’t enforce BibTeX’s default
> rules." from the website you suggested, the same thing I set up with
> \setuppublications[alternative=...]
Yes, I believe so (though I get a bit confused with BibTeX, so I could
be wrong). Personally I use the suggested solution of wrapping
‘proper’ capital latters in {}. If you need a custom style that
doesn't decapitalize article titles, that's beyond my BibTeXpertise
but maybe there is someone else here who can help.
> ? I'm using "ams" there and realized that the title tag of @book is not
> treated that way (so with @book there are caps inside the title without
> extra {} in the bib-file).
This is the case for most bibliography styles: journal articles only
get capitals for the first letter, proper nouns, chemical symbols, etc.;
Book Titles get Capital Letters for Most Words.
Pont
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
