On Tue 24 May 2011, Stefan Müller wrote: > is the bibliograph style as mentioned in "If your document design > specification requires a different style of capitalisation, you should > acquire a bibliography style that doesn’t enforce BibTeX’s default > rules." from the website you suggested, the same thing I set up with > \setuppublications[alternative=...]
Yes, I believe so (though I get a bit confused with BibTeX, so I could be wrong). Personally I use the suggested solution of wrapping ‘proper’ capital latters in {}. If you need a custom style that doesn't decapitalize article titles, that's beyond my BibTeXpertise but maybe there is someone else here who can help. > ? I'm using "ams" there and realized that the title tag of @book is not > treated that way (so with @book there are caps inside the title without > extra {} in the bib-file). This is the case for most bibliography styles: journal articles only get capitals for the first letter, proper nouns, chemical symbols, etc.; Book Titles get Capital Letters for Most Words. Pont ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________