On 12 juin 2011, at 23:47, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 12-6-2011 9:15, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > >> What a lame excuse, “si” is easier to remember than “su” and even >> though the code isn’t limited to si units this isn’t a good reason >> to avoid the name. > > I don't like \su either but I needed something that related to \unit (which > is what I prefer) but the problem is that one then cannot us the m-units > module at the same time. Well, I could save \unit when loading it, and one > can wonder if they will be used mixed anyway so we might end up with \unit. > We have a \m (inline math) macro and I'd like a one character one for units > and digits and these could be \u and \d if we can assume that everyone uses > utf (we could make them accent commands while dealing with bibtex).
…so why not \SIunit or \siunit? ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
