Dnia 2011-09-19, o godz. 17:43:29
Aditya Mahajan <adit...@umich.edu> napisał(a):
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
>
> > Dnia 2011-09-19, pon o godzinie 11:19 -0400, Aditya Mahajan pisze:
> >> On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'd like to have some MP code shared between unique graphics (in
> >>> MkIV).
> >>>
> >>> One example: I'd like to have drawoptions <something> for all
> >>> graphics.
> >>
> >> \startMPinclusions
> >> drawoptions(...) ;
> >> \stopMPinclusions
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >>
> >>> Another one: I'd like to have two similar (but different) unique
> >>> graphics, and I'd like them to share some code.
> >>
> >> \startuseMPgraphic{common}
> >> ...
> >> \stopuseMPgraphic
> >>
> >> \startuseMPgraphic{one}
> >> \includeMPgraphic{common}
> >> ....
> >> \stopuseMPgraphic
> >>
> >> \startuseMPgraphic{two}
> >> \includeMPgraphic{common}
> >> ....
> >> \stopuseMPgraphic
> >
> > And what about *unique* graphics?
>
> \includeMPgraphics should also work inside unique graphics. In any
> case, in MkIV, MP processing is extremely fast, so uniqueMPgraphics
> is not really needed.
I see, I'll check it tomorrow (it's 1:36am here now;)). One question,
though: isn't unique graphic better than "useMPgraphic" in terms of the
resulting pdf file size?
> Aditya
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
