On 2011-10-18 Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> […] > > To be sure I looked for the correct input and also MkII expects > the + and - before the location of the node but MkII had “n” as > synonym for + which is now “m” in MkIV. I see. Thanks for checking the sources. That means the syntax is as follows: -t t +t ---------------- +l | | +r | | l | | r | | -l | | -r | | ---------------- -b b +b I added a section to the wiki. Marco ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________