You have generally right ... But I think that you must not take the
measure of the devilish speed the development rate of development of
ConTEXt :-)
I often I make a text document using the Context and the resulting PDF
document I put into Scribus. With Scribus I put graphics, titles etc.
For normal use Scribus is a good choice. But you have right - for
professional work in the end one needs a professional tool like InDesign
or QuarkXpress.
Jaroslav
Dne 28.2.2012 23:26, Henning Hraban Ramm napsal(a):
But it still lacks a lot of essential features for professional work
(at least in my area), e.g. usable master pages and nondestructional
import of vector graphics (esp. PDF), CMYK and spot colors. Correct me
if it gained these lastly - I know they're working on it, but the
development speed is much much slower than ConTeXt’s. Maybe it’s more
stable and reliable therefore...
Scribus has at least one feature that sets it ahead of InDesign
(besides being Open Source): render frames (similar functionality as
ConTeX’s filter module - replace foreign sourcecode by its result).
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
